Parliamentary privilege (MPs can speak on issues the media have been barred from through court injunctions, so long as they make their statement inside the Houses of Parliament)...
Superinjunctions (see this eg), where the media are barred from even reporting on the court case applying for the injunction...
Libel and slander (actually quite distinct...); going straight to court...
For the privileged few, travelling in the same circles as the press elite...
The press barons largely observe a truce on each other; papers rarely feature negtaive reportage on other owners unless they're clearly on their way out (eg Conrad Black)
Resources and analysis on the topic of media regulation, particularly for the A2 Media exam, Section B. Major case studies include the film industry, music video and the press, with major players such as Murdoch, OfCom and the government considered. If using materials from this blog, please credit the source - Dave Burrowes, Media Studies @ St George's School
Exam date
Some key posts and resources
- 2019 and earlier IPSO cases
- 2021 overview
- BBFC historic bans, subjective judgement?
- BBFC Human Centipede 2
- BBFC overview essay style writing
- BBFC overview with vids
- BBFC U/PG cases Postman Pat--Paddington--Watership Down
- Daily Mail IPSO google
- EU press flak
- IPSO arbitration fines scheme
- IPSO children rulings
- IPSO PCC arguments FOR
- Murdoch flak/conc of ownership
- MUSIC RACISM drill musicians criminalised
- Press reg history (website)
- Privacy 2018 summary
- Social media alt to IPSO?
- Social media as alt reg/FAANGS power up to early 2019
- StopFundingHate
- Tabloid Corrections
- Telegraph libel payout AFTER IPSO ruling unsatisfactory
- The Rock Daily Star Insta
Thursday, 14 April 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments and suggestions are very welcome ... but please ensure all comments are appropriate! All comments are moderated before publication. Spam will be reported